Cases 1 - 10 of 13
James C Hays v. Linda B. Bammann et al
as 2:2016cv01142
Defendant:
Linda B. Bammann, James A. Bell, Crandall C. Bowles and others
Plaintiff:
James C. Hays
Louis Jean-Louis v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., et al
as 14-56135
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LOUIS J. JEAN-LOUIS, Private Attorney General
Defendant - Appellee:
J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., CALIFORNIA RECONVEYANCE COMPANY, DEBORAH BRIGNAC and others
Horwitz v. Dimon et al
as 2:2014cv01489
Plaintiff:
Mayer Horwitz
Defendant:
James Dimon, James Bell, Crandall C. Bowles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Horwitz v. Dimon et al
as 2:2014at00797
Plaintiff:
Mayer Horwitz
Defendant:
James Dimon, James Bell, Crandall C. Bowles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Jean-Louis v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 5:2014cv00199
Defendant:
Linda A. Bammann, Angela Barry, Tom Basmajian and others
Plaintiff:
Louis J. Jean-Louis
Miller v. Bell et al
as 2:2014cv00227
Plaintiff:
Bradley P Miller
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase & Co., James Bell , Crandall C. Bowles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miller v. Bell et al
as 2:2014at00100
Plaintiff:
Bradley P Miller
Unknown:
JPmorgan Chase Co.
Defendant:
James Bell, Crandall C. Bowles, Stephen B. Burke and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ratcliff v. Dimon et al
as 2:2014cv00062
Plaintiff:
Richard Ratcliff
Defendant:
Jamie Dimon, James A. Bell , Crandall C Bowles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Joliet Fire Pension Fund v. Dimon et al
as 2:2014at00022
Plaintiff:
Joliet Fire Pension Fund
Defendant:
James Dimon, James - Bell, Crandall C. Bowles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Joliet Fire Pension Fund v. Dimon et al
as 2:2014cv00041
Plaintiff:
Joliet Fire Pension Fund and Richard Ratcliff
Defendant:
James Dimon, James - Bell , Crandall C. Bowles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
