Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Wazney v. Nelson et al
as 6:2020cv03366
Defendant:
Ken Nelson, Lefford Fate, Lee Medical Dr and others
Plaintiff:
Robert William Wazney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scruggs v. Stirling et al
as 1:2019cv00921
Defendant:
Beverly Wood, Robert Poiletman, Rubin Ridgway and others
Plaintiff:
Susan Diane Scruggs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garrett v. Stirling et al
as 0:2018cv01309
Plaintiff:
Robert Louis Garrett, Jr.
Defendant:
Bryan P. Stirling, Bernard McKie, Franklin Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Glisson v. Riley et al
as 6:2017cv02599
Plaintiff:
Andrew N Glisson
Defendant:
Tim Riley, Lefford Fate, John McRee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Geissler v. Sterling et al
as 4:2017cv01746
Plaintiff:
Russell Geissler
Defendant:
Bryan P Sterling and Lefford Fate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Porterfield v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2017cv00888
Plaintiff:
Keith B. Porterfield
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections , Bryan P. Stirling , Lefford Fate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flemming v. Dutch Fork Magistrate Court et al
as 4:2016cv03708
Plaintiff:
James Michael Flemming
Defendant:
Dutch Fork Magistrate Court, Melvin Wayne Maurer, Stoney Drake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Glisson v. Riley et al
as 6:2016cv03363
Plaintiff:
Andrew N Glisson
Defendant:
Tim Riley , Lefford Fate , John McRee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stroud v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2016cv02892
Plaintiff:
Pamela Stroud
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections , Bryan Stirling , Lefford Fate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McClain v. Fate et al
as 0:2015cv04516
Plaintiff:
Daniel R McClain
Defendant:
Lefford Fate, Samuel Soltis, John B Tomarchio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
