Cases 1 - 10 of 158
CVB, Inc. v. US
as 24-1566
Plaintiff:
CVB, INC.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, BROOKLYN BEDDING, LLC, CORSICANA MATTRESS CO. and others
CVB, Inc. v. US
as 24-1504
Plaintiff:
CVB, INC.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES, BROOKLYN BEDDING, LLC, CORSICANA MATTRESS CO. and others
CVB v. Corsicana Mattress Company, et al
as 22-4054
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CVB, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
CORSICANA MATTRESS COMPANY, ELITE COMFORT SOLUTIONS, INC., FUTURE FOAM, INC. and others
NLRB v. Leggett & Platt, Inc.
as 20-1134
Petitioner:
National Labor Relations Board
Respondent:
Leggett & Platt, Inc.
Leggett & Platt, Inc. v. NLRB
as 20-1060
Petitioner:
Leggett & Platt, Inc.
Respondent:
National Labor Relations Board
NLRB v. Leggett & Platt, Inc.
as 19-1034
Petitioner:
National Labor Relations Board
Respondent:
Leggett & Platt, Inc.
The Government of Puerto Rico v. The Carpenter Company et al
as 3:2018cv01987
Defendant:
Vitafoam Products Canada, Limited, David Carson, Otto Bock Polyurethane Technologies, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
The Government of Puerto Rico
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25
Leggett & Platt, Inc. v. NLRB
as 19-1003
Petitioner:
Leggett & Platt, Inc.
Respondent:
National Labor Relations Board
Kolcraft Enterprises, Inc. v. Hickory Springs Manufacturing Company et al
as 3:2013pf10000
Defendant:
FFP Holdings, LLC, Hickory Springs Manufacturing Company, Valle Foam Industries, Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Kolcraft Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Medi-Pedic Bedding Co., Inc. et al v. Hickory Springs Manufacturing Company et al
as 3:2012pf10022
Plaintiff:
Medi-Pedic Bedding Co., Inc. doing business as Englander Southwest, Fraenkel Company doing business as Englander South Central, Tualatin Sleep Products, Inc. doing business as Englander Northwest and others
Defendant:
Hickory Springs Manufacturing Company, Carpenter Company, Flexible Foam Products, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
