Cases 1 - 10 of 42
SCHMIDT v. LEIGHTON STATE POLICE BARRACKS et al
as 3:2021cv00317
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe Leighton State Trooper, Carbon County Sherrif Dept., Kirby and others
Plaintiff:
Jessica Marie Schmidt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
NOEL v. LEIGHTON SECURITY SERVICES, INC
as 3:2021cv00023
Defendant:
LEIGHTON SECURITY SERVICES, INC
Plaintiff:
CLAYTON NOEL
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
SCHMIDT v. LEIGHTON STATE POLICE BARRACKS et al
as 2:2021cv00736
Defendant:
JOHN/JANE DOE LEIGHTON STATE TROOPER, CARBON COUNTY SHERRIF DEPT., OFFICER SWARTZ and others
Plaintiff:
JESSICA MARIE SCHMIDT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01661
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00083
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00712
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
JOHNSON et al v. SESAME PLACE et al
as 2:2018cv02999
Plaintiff:
B., ALEAH JOHNSON and A.
Defendant:
ROBERT TALBERT, SESAME PLACE, SEA WORLD PARKS & ENTERTAINMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
LEIGHTON et al v. UNLIMITED TECHNOLOGY, INC.
as 2:2017cv03286
Plaintiff:
RICK LEIGHTON , DTS SECURITY, INC. and SECURE VIZUAL, LLC
Defendant:
UNLIMITED TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
LEIGHTON et al v. UNLIMITED TECHNOLOGY, INC.
as 2:2017cv03233
Plaintiff:
RICK LEIGHTON , DTS SECURITY, INC. and SECURE VIZUAL, LLC
Defendant:
UNLIMITED TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
UNLIMITED TECHNOLOGY, INC. v. LEIGHTON et al
as 2:2017cv01913
Plaintiff:
UNLIMITED TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Defendant:
RICHARD LEIGHTON , DTS SECURITY, INC. and SECURE VIZUAL, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
