Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Banks v. Woodward, Inc.
as 3:2022cv50266
Plaintiff:
Leroy Banks
Defendant:
Woodward, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Leroy Banks, III v. Georgia State Board of Pardons, et al
as 20-13266
Respondent / Appellee:
GEORGIA STATE BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY SERVICES and BOWMAN, Officer
Petitioner / Appellant:
LEROY BANKS, III
Banks v. Georgia Pardon and Parole et al
as 1:2019cv05495
Respondent:
Georgia Pardon and Parole, P.O. Mr. Bowman and Georgia Department of Comm. Services
Petitioner:
Leroy Banks, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BANKS v. TERRY, et al
as 5:2018cv00435
Defendant:
SHERIFF DAVID DAVIS, DEPUTY T EDWARDS, DEPUTY ANTHONY TERRY and others
Plaintiff:
LEROY BANKS, III, LAVERNE JOHNSON and TAVARIS JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BANKS v. BIBB COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE et al
as 5:2018cv00139
Plaintiff:
LEROY BANKS, III, LAVERNE JOHNSON and TAVARIS JOHNSON
Defendant:
BIBB COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE, ANTHONY TERRY, STEPHEN FIELDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leroy Banks v. Warden, et al
as 18-11061
Petitioner - Appellant:
LEROY BANKS
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN and COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
James Dorsey v. Tarry Williams, et al
as 18-1341
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES LEE DORSEY
Defendant - Appellee:
TARRY WILLIAMS, Warden, Former Warden, LEROY BANKS, Officer Tact Team, ANNA MCBEE and others
Banks v. Head et al
as 1:2017cv03980
Petitioner:
Leroy Banks
Respondent:
Frederick J. Head and Georgia Dept. of Correction
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
In re: Leroy Banks
as 17-10197
Petitioner:
In re: LEROY BANKS
Successive Habeas Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF GEORGIA
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Banks et al
as 4:2016cv00788
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Raymond Leroy Banks, Arianna B Worton, Daniel Chase McIlroy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
