Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Andre Jamison v. Chris King
as 23-1501
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANDRE LEROY JAMISON
Respondent / Appellee:
CHRIS KING, Warden
Jamison v. Campbell
as 2:2022cv10282
Petitioner:
Andre Leroy Jamison
Respondent:
Sherman Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Moore v. Jamison et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2019cv00612
Defendant:
Joey Craig and Leroy Jamison
Plaintiff:
Charles Eugene Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fortson v. Jamison et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv00493
Defendant:
David Rogers, J. Thomas, Sgt. Lewis and others
Plaintiff:
Antonio Maurice Fortson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jamison v. Oakland County Sheriff Department et al
as 2:2015cv13748
Plaintiff:
Andre Leroy Jamison
Defendant:
Oakland County Sheriff Department, City of Pontiac, Daniel Main and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jamison v. Emmett, Charter Township of et al
as 1:2013cv01250
Plaintiff:
Leroy Jamison
Defendant:
Emmett, Charter Township of, Calhoun, County of, James Mackey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Phillips v. Bentley et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2011cv00977
Plaintiff:
Ronald L. Phillips
Defendant:
Robert Bentley , Kim Tobias Thomas , Leeposey Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chrenko v. Bentley et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2011cv00978
Plaintiff:
Charles G. Chrenko
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas , Leeposey Daniels , C. McKee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Griffin v. Bentley et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2011cv00976
Plaintiff:
Kenneth R. Griffin
Defendant:
Robert Bentley , Kim Tobias Thomas , Leeposey Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barley v. Bentley et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2011cv00974
Plaintiff:
Daniel M. Barley
Defendant:
Robert Bentley , Kim Tobias Thomas , Leeposey Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
