Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Shaner v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2014cv01263
Plaintiff:
Wesley P. Shaner
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Levan Thomas, Lt. Gray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norwood v. Thomas et al
as 5:2014cv00430
Plaintiff:
Joseph Norwood
Defendant:
Kim T Thomas, Corizon, Inc., Bettina Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Hall v. Thomas et al (INMATE 3)
as 1:2013cv00901
Plaintiff:
Stevan Douglas Hall
Defendant:
Levan Thomas and Luther Strange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Walker v. Thomas et al
as 7:2011cv00327
Petitioner:
Willie Walker
Respondent:
Levan Thomas , Attorney General of the State of Alabama and Alabama, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Walker v. Thomas et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2010cv01083
Plaintiff:
Willie Walker
Defendant:
Levan Thomas, Troy King and State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ramsey v. Rogers et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2010cv00686
Plaintiff:
Elliot Ramsey
Defendant:
Keith Rogers, Levan Thomas and Richard Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Allen et al
as 2:2010cv00657
Plaintiff:
Darrell Williams
Defendant:
Richard Allen, Vernon Barnett, James DeLoach and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Allen et al
as 1:2009cv00697
Plaintiff:
Darrell Williams
Defendant:
Richard Allen, Vernon Barnett, James Deloach and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bender v. Baylor et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2009cv00789
Plaintiff:
Tenneyson Bender
Defendant:
A. D. Baylor, Todd Strange, Levan Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2008cv00945
Plaintiff:
Robert Junior Robinson
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Richard Allen, Levan Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
