Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Cycrus Tucker v. James Mett
as 11-6444
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CYCRUS TUCKER, a/k/a Cycrus Kenyan Tucker, a/k/a Pimp C
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF LEXINGTON, SOUTH CAROLINA, LEXINGTON COUNTY FOOD SERVICE PROVIDERS, JAMES METTS, in charge of Lexington County Detention Center and others
Hernandes v. Lexington et al
as 8:2010cv01306
Defendant:
County Of Lexington and Lexington County Food Service Providers
Plaintiff:
Carlos Hernandes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tucker v. Lexington et al
as 8:2010cv01316
Defendant:
County Of Lexington and Lexington County Food Service Providers
Plaintiff:
Cycrus Tucker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Poplin v. Lexington et al
as 8:2010cv01311
Defendant:
County Of Lexington and Lexington County Food Service Providers
Plaintiff:
Michael Poplin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Lexington et al
as 8:2010cv01314
Defendant:
County Of Lexington and Lexington County Food Service Providers
Plaintiff:
Terry Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fuller v. Lexington et al
as 8:2010cv01310
Defendant:
County Of Lexington and Lexington County Food Service Providers
Plaintiff:
Kevin Fuller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pippin v. Lexington et al
as 8:2010cv01318
Defendant:
County Of Lexington and Lexington County Food Service Providers
Plaintiff:
Anthony Pippin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paulling v. Lexington et al
as 8:2010cv01320
Defendant:
County Of Lexington and Lexington County Food Service Providers
Plaintiff:
Stanley Paulling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. Lexington et al
as 8:2010cv01307
Defendant:
County Of Lexington and Lexington County Food Service Providers
Plaintiff:
Ricardo James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Redmond v. Lexington et al
as 8:2010cv01312
Defendant:
County Of Lexington and Lexington County Food Service Providers
Plaintiff:
Eric Redmond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
