Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Childers et al v. Life Protect 24/7, Inc.
as 8:2024cv01339
Plaintiff:
Patricia Bailey Childers and Luqman Muhammad
Defendant:
Life Protect 24/7, Inc. d/b/a Life Protect 24/7
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Dobronski v. Life Protect 24/7, Inc.
as 2:2022cv10707
Plaintiff:
Mark W. Dobronski
Defendant:
Life Protect 24/7, Inc.
Honiball v. Life Protect 24/7, Inc.
as 1:2021cv06928
Plaintiff:
Michael Honiball
Defendant:
Life Protect 24/7, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Thomas v. Life Protect 24/7, Inc.
as 4:2020cv03612
Plaintiff:
Kelly Thomas
Defendant:
Life Protect 24/7, Inc. doing business as Life Protect 24/7
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Vousoghian v. Life Protect 24/7, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00382
Defendant:
John Does 1-10 and Life Protect 24/7, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Sheila Vousoghian
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv02154
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Life Alert Emergency Response, Inc. v. Life Protect 24/7, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00500
Defendant:
Life Protect 24/7, Inc. and Does 1-10 through 10, inclusive
Plaintiff:
Life Alert Emergency Response, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Williams v. Life Protect 24/7, Inc.
as 1:2019cv01269
Defendant:
Life Protect 24/7, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Leeroy Williams
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Life Alert Emergency Response, Inc. v. Life Protect 24/7, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv06816
Defendant:
Life Protect 24/7, Inc. and Does 1-10 through 10, inclusive
Plaintiff:
Life Alert Emergency Response, Inc., a California corporation and Life Alert Emergency Response, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Primack v. Life Protect 24/7, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv05249
Plaintiff:
Merrill Primack
Defendant:
Life Protect 24/7, Inc. and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
