Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Orlando v. City of New York et al
as 1:2017cv02001
Defendant:
P.O. John Doe #1, John Doe #2, John Doe #3 and others
Plaintiff:
Lisa Orlando
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Amorin et al v. China National Building Materials Import and Export Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv00455
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Amorin , Carmen Amorin , Jerry Baldwin and others
Defendant:
CNBM Forest Products Canada Ltd. and China National Building Materials & Equipment Import & Export Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Amorin et al v. China National Building Materials Import and Export Corporation et al
as 3:2015cv00184
Plaintiff:
Carmen Amorin, Eduardo Amorin, Inez Baldwin and others
Defendant:
CNBM Forest Products (Canada) Ltd. and China National Building Materials Import and Export Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Amorin et al v. China National Building Materials Import and Export Corporation et al
as OR/3:15-cv-00184
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Amorin , Carmen Amorin , Jerry Baldwin and others
Defendant:
China National Building Materials Import and Export Corporation and CNBM Forest Products (Canada) Ltd.
Wiltz et al v. Beijing New Building Material Public Limited Company et al
as 2:2010cv00361
Defendant:
Alpha Homes, Inc., K. Hovnanian First Homes, LLC, Allied Building Products Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Mel Litwin, Ashley Ball, Kathryn Reeves and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Vacationhit, LLC, Lauren Dryman, Arlen Maradona and others
Cross Defendant:
Prowall Drywall, Inc., Pingyi Zhongxing Paper Faced Plasterboard Co. Ltd., Panel Rey and others
Cross Claimant:
Bass Homes, Inc., R. Fry Builders, Inc. and L&W Supply Corporation doing business as Seacoast Supply
3Rd Party Defendant:
1st Drywall, LLC
Intervenor:
Annette Goddard, Lambert & Nelson PLC and Alan Goddard
Intervenor Defendant:
Patrick Parr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
