Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Tucker v. Massage Envy
as 1:2021cv01301
Defendant:
Massage Envy and Massage Envy Franchising, LLC
Plaintiff:
Lisa Tucker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SMITH et al v. SHOE SHOW, INC. et al
as 1:2020cv00813
Plaintiff:
SARAH SMITH, JEFFREY MORROW and MICHAEL CRISCO
Defendant:
SHOE SHOW, INC., BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF SHOE SHOW RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLAN, LISA TUCKER and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Jack Wilson v. Wexford Health Sources, et al
as 17-60181
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JACK B. WILSON
Defendant - Appellee:
WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, CEO and President, CENTURION OF MISSISSIPPI, Willie Knight, Site Manager, MARSHALL L. FISHER, COMMISSIONER, MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Bennie Ward v. Christopher Epp
as 17-60147
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BENNIE WARD
Defendant - Appellee:
LISA TUCKER
Tucker v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2016cv11032
Plaintiff:
Lisa Tucker
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Quirk v. Stephens et al
as 5:2016cv00757
Plaintiff:
James E. Quirk
Defendant:
Donald W. Stephens , Paul Gessner , Kendra D. Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lisa Tucker v. City of Pasadena et al
as 2:2015cv00726
Defendant:
City of Pasadena, Does, Officer Kathryn Jorge and others
Plaintiff:
Lisa Tucker
Progressive Direct Insurance Company v. Heiman et al
as 5:2014cv01038
Plaintiff:
Progressive Direct Insurance Company
Defendant:
Rodney Heiman , Jennifer Heiman , Mykolas Staniunas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bennie Ward v. Christopher Epps, et al
as 13-60152
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BENNIE WARD
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER EPPS, DOCTOR LORENZO CABE, LISA TUCKER and others
Ward v. Epps et al
as 4:2012cv00106
Plaintiff:
Bennie Ward
Defendant:
Christopher Epps, Lorenzo Cabe, Lisa Tucker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
