Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Little Rock Fam Planning Svcs, et al v. Larry Jegley, et al
as 21-2857
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Little Rock Family Planning Services, on behalf of itself and its patients, Planned Parenthood of Arkansas & Eastern Oklahoma, on behalf of itself and its patients, doing business as Planned Parenthood Great Plains and Janet R. Cathey, M.D. on behalf of herself and her patients
Defendant / Appellant:
Larry Jegley, in his official capacity as Prosecuting Attorney of Pulaski County, Sylvia D. Simon, M.D. in her official capacity as Chairman of the Arkansas State Medical Board, Robert Breving, M.D., in his official capacity as officer/member of the Arkansas State Medical Board and others
Little Rock Family Planning Services et al v. Jegley et al
as 4:2021cv00453
Defendant:
Marsha Boss, William L Rutledge, Melissa Faulkenberry and others
Plaintiff:
Planned Parenthood of Arkansas & Eastern Oklahoma on behalf of itself and its patients doing business as Planned Parenthood Great Plains, Little Rock Family Planning Services and Janet Cathey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Frederick Hopkins, et al v. Larry Jegley, et al
as 21-1068
Defendant / Appellant:
Carl Riddell, M.D., Officer and member of the Arkansas Department of Health, Dwayne Daniels, M.D., Officer and member of the Arkansas Department of Health, Brian T. Hyatt, M.D., Officer and Member of the State Medical Board and others
Defendant:
Bob Cogburn, M.D., officer and member of the Arkansas State Medical Board, and successors in office, in his official capacity, John B. Weiss, M.D., officer and member of the Arkansas State Medical Board, and successors in office, in his official capacity, Steven L. Cathey, M.D., Chair of the Arkansas State Medical Board and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Little Rock Family Planning Services, Inc. and Frederick W. Hopkins, M.D., M.P.H.
Appellant:
State of Kentucky, State of Alabama, State of Arizona and others
Little Rock Family Planning Services et al v. Rutledge et al
as 4:2020cv00470
Defendant:
John H Scribner, Veryl D Hodges, Leslie Rutledge and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Tvedten and Little Rock Family Planning Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Little Rock Fam. Planning Svcs, et al v. Leslie Rutledge, et al
as 19-2690
Defendant / Appellant:
William L. Rutledge, M.D., in his offical capacity as member of the Arkansas State Medical Board, Timothy C. Paden, M.D., in his official capacity as member of the Arkansas State Medical Board, Robert Breving, M.D., in his official capacity as member of the Arkansas State Medical Board and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Tom Tvedten, M.D., on behalf of himself and his patients, Stephanie Ho, MD, M.D. on behalf of herself and her patients, Little Rock Family Planning Services and others
Little Rock Family Planning Services et al v. Rutledge et al
as 4:2019cv00449
Defendant:
William L Rutledge, Matt Durrett, Don R Phillips and others
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Ho, Thomas Tvedten, Little Rock Family Planning Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Little Rock Family Planning, et al v. Arkansas Board of Health
as 19-1532
Defendant / Appellant:
Arkansas Board of Health
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Little Rock Family Planning Services and Planned Parenthood of Arkansas and Eastern Oklahoma, doing business as Planned Parenthood Great Plains
Little Rock Family Planning Services et al v. Arkansas Board of Health
as 4:2019cv00046
Plaintiff:
Little Rock Family Planning Services, Planned Parenthood of Arkansas and Eastern Oklahoma and Planned Parenthood of Arkansas and Eastern Oklahoma doing business as Planned Parenthood Great Plains
Defendant:
Arkansas Board of Health
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Planned Parenthood Arkansas & Eastern Oklahoma et al v. Smith
as 4:2017cv00401
Defendant:
Nathaniel Smith
Plaintiff:
Little Rock Family Planning Services, Planned Parenthood Arkansas & Eastern Oklahoma and Planned Parenthood Arkansas & Eastern Oklahoma On Behalf of Itself and its Patients doing business as Planned Parenthood Great Plains
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
