Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01466
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Cai et al v. Zilkha Biomass Energy, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00104
Plaintiff:
Yiqun Cai, Yan Rong, Jun Liu and others
Defendant:
Zilkha Biomass Energy, LLC, Nextgen Black Pellets, LLC, Zilkha Biomass Fuels I, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Price v. Netflix Corporation et al
as 5:2021cv01511
Plaintiff:
Renzie Wilson Price
Defendant:
Netflix Corporation, Michael B. Jordan, Carol Barbee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00282
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Jun et al v. Regions Bank
as 1:2019cv01524
Plaintiff:
Liu Danquing, Gao Yi, Man Mingyue and others
Defendant:
Regions Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv01392
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Birmingham Retirement & Relief System, City of v. ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc et al
as 2:2017cv01091
Plaintiff:
Birmingham Retirement & Relief System, City of
Defendant:
ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc , Meisong Lai, Jianfa Lai and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Radford v. Dunn et al
as 1:2015cv00396
Plaintiff:
Thomas Radford
Defendant:
Jefferson Dunn, Robert Bentley, Robert Brantley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Liu v. Hassell et al
as 4:2012cv00392
Petitioner:
Wing Nuen Liu
Respondent:
Scott Hassell , Philip T Miller , Janet Napolitano and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00303
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
