Cases 1 - 10 of 389
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00636
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e-2
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1303
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
WHITLOCK v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2024cv01361
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH E WHITLOCK
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Christine Wormuth, THE DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1266
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
BUENAVENTURA et al v. EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT et al
as 2:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
IAN R BUENAVENTURA
Defendant:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT, LLOYD J AUSTIN, III, JOHN DOES (1-10) and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Roy Perry-Bey v. Lloyd Austin, III
as 24-1234
Plaintiff:
ROY L. PERRY-BEY
Defendant:
LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III, in his official capacity as Secretary of Defense, DENIS R. MCDONOUGH, in his official capacity as Secretary of Veterans Affairs, CHRISTINE WORMUTH, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Army and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5056
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 794 Rehabilitation Act
Animal Behavior College, Inc. v. U.S. Department of Defense et al
as 2:2024cv01962
Plaintiff:
ANIMAL BEHAVIOR COLLEGE, INC.
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Defense, Lloyd J. Austin III, Patricia Montes Barron and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
