Cases 21 - 30 of 355
Temujin Kensu v. Joshua Buskirk, et al
as 16-1536
Plaintiff - Appellee:
TEMUJIN KENSU
Defendant:
JOSHUA A. BUSKIRK, PANJAK MALIK, HOWARD V. TYREE and others
Defendant - Appellant:
JEFFREY STIEVE, SUSAN MCCAULEY, MARY ZAMORA and others
Carletus Williams v. Heidi Washington, et al
as 16-1317
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARLETUS WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, Director of Michigan Department of Corrections, LLOYD RAPELJE, Assistant Director, CORRECTIONS OFFICER (LMF) HILL and others
Robert Brannon v. Lloyd Rapelje
as 16-1124
Petitioner - Appellee:
ROBERT K. BRANNON
Respondent - Appellant:
LLOYD RAPELJE, Warden
Carletus Williams v. Heidi Washington, et al
as 16-1094
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARLETUS WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
HEIDI WASHINGTON, Director, MIchigan Department of Corrections, LLOYD RAPELJE, Assistant Director, UNKNOWN HILL, Corrections Officer and others
Carletus Williams v. Heidi Washington, et al
as 16-1095
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARLETUS WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
HEIDI WASHINGTON, Director of Michigan Department of Corrections, LLOYD RAPELJE, Assistant Director, CORRECTIONS OFFICER (LMF) UNKNOWN HILL and others
Michael Shavers v. David Bergh, et al
as 15-2500
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL SHAVERS
Defendant:
DAVID BERGH, Warden and LLOYD RAPELJE
Defendant - Appellee:
UNKNOWN STASEWICH and UNKNOWN ENTERLINE
Williams #206039 v. Washington et al
as 2:2015cv00191
Plaintiff:
Carletus Lashawn Williams #206039
Defendant:
Heidi Washington, Lloyd Rapelje, Unknown Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Williams v. Washington et al
as 2:2015cv13951
Plaintiff:
Carletus Williams
Defendant:
Heidi Washington, Lloyd Rapelje, Hill and others
Virgil Napier v. Lloyd Rapelje
as 15-2140
Petitioner - Appellant:
VIRGIL NAPIER
Respondent - Appellee:
LLOYD RAPELJE, named as State of Michigan
Edward Johnson v. Lloyd Rapelje
as 15-1593
Petitioner - Appellant:
EDWARD JOHNSON
Respondent - Appellee:
LLOYD RAPELJE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
