Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Boyd v. Rokosky
as 1:2024cv00420
Petitioner: Lonnie Boyd
Respondent: Warden E. Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Boyd v. Rokosky et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00243
Defendant: E. Rokosky, General Counsel and Regional Director
Plaintiff: Lonnie Boyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Lonnie Boyd
as 22-5823
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant: LONNIE BOYD
USA v. Lonnie Boyd
as 19-6484
Defendant / Appellant: LONNIE BOYD
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Boyd et al v. J.C. Ehrlich Company, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv05096
Plaintiff: Lonnie Boyd , Bill Anderson , Carol Clark and others
Defendant: J.C. Ehrlich Company, Inc. , Mars Petcare US, Inc. and Frank Vasquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Lonnie Boyd v. Chesapeake Correctional Center We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-7946
Plaintiff - Appellant: LONNIE BOYD
Defendant - Appellee: CHESAPEAKE CORRECTIONAL CENTER, Medical Department, MS. BONNEY, Nurse and MS. TOPIN, Nurse
Lonnie Boyd v. Gene Johnson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-7945
Petitioner - Appellant: LONNIE BOYD
Respondent - Appellee: GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections
Boyd v. Chesapeake Correctional Center
as 2:2009cv00466
Petitioner: Lonnie Boyd
Respondent: Chesapeake Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Boyd v. Chesapeake Correctional Center
as 2:2009cv00337
Petitioner: Lonnie Boyd
Respondent: Chesapeake Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Boyd v. Chesapeake Corr. Ctr.
as 2:2009cv00328
Plaintiff: Lonnie Boyd
Defendant: Chesapeake Corr. Ctr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?