Cases 1 - 10 of 83
BUNDY v. SESSIONS et al
as 1:2018cv02520
Defendant:
LORETTA E. LYNCH, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III and others
Plaintiff:
Ryan Bundy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HALL v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2018cv02063
Defendant:
BRIAN D. KARTH, MAUREEN P. BAIRD, SARA M. REVELL and others
Plaintiff:
GORDON LEROY HALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
WARREN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2018cv01329
Plaintiff:
JACK WADE WARREN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, LORETTA E. LYNCH, JEFF SESSIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
HAZEL v. LYNCH
as 1:2017cv00290
Petitioner:
BOBBY E. HAZEL
Respondent:
LORETTA E. LYNCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BERRY v. HOLLAND et al
as 1:2017cv00204
Plaintiff:
DUANE LETROY BERRY
Defendant:
J.C. HOLLAND and LORETTA E. LYNCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
PATEL v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2017cv00100
Plaintiff:
BHAVIN H. PATEL
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY , UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP & IMMIGRATION SERVICES , JEH JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00086
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00054
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
MARRERO v. STATE OF ILLINOIS et al
as 1:2017cv00079
Plaintiff:
EDWIN MARRERO
Defendant:
STATE OF ILLINOIS, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II, STATE OF ILLINOIS GOVERNORS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STANLEY et al v. LYNCH et al
as 1:2017cv00022
Plaintiff:
HAROLD R. STANLEY, MICHAEL BEALS ELLIS and ROBERT A. MCNEIL
Defendant:
LORETTA E. LYNCH, BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II and JOHN KOSKINEN
Movant:
BARRY EUGENE BROOKS and WILLIAM B. MCGARVIN
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
