Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Matthews v. Marshall et al
as 1:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
Richards Matthews
Defendant:
Dr. Denese Marshall, Dr. Jewel V. Owen, PHD G. Rita Dudley-Grant and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
THOMPSON v. INGKA GROUP, LLC doing business as IKEA
as 2:2021cv05288
Plaintiff:
LORI THOMPSON
Defendant:
INGKA GROUP, LLC doing business as IKEA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
THOMPSON v. SAUL
as 1:2021cv01952
Plaintiff:
ANDREW SAUL, LORI THOMPSON and LORI A. THOMPSON
Defendant:
ANDREW M. SAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Thompson v Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al.,
as 9:2021cv80327
Defendant:
Chattem, Inc., Appco Pharma LLC, Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Lori Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Money et al v. Pritzker et al
as 1:2020cv02093
Plaintiff:
Carl Reed, Tewkunzi Green, Danny Labosette and others
Defendant:
Director of IDOC Rob Jeffreys, Governor J.B. Pritzker, Rob Jeffreys and others
Intervenor:
Jennifer Bishop-Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dale Thompson et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2018cv06985
Plaintiff:
Dale Thompson and Lori Thompson
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal -- Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-11581
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Thompson et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2018at00421
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Plaintiff:
Dale Thompson and Lori Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Thompson et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2018cv00753
Plaintiff:
Dale Thompson and Lori Thompson
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Thompson et al v. Ford Motor Company
as CAE/2:18-CV-00753
Plaintiff:
Thompson, Dale Thompson and Lori Thompson
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
