Cases 1 - 10 of 2,044
Ricks v. Louisiana State Penitentiary et al
as 3:2025cv00332
Plaintiff:
Wesley S. Ricks
Defendant:
Louisiana State Penitentiary, Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections and Unknown Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lafleur v. Vannoy
as 25-30220
Petitioner:
Dannie Lee Lafleur
Respondent:
Darrel Vannoy, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary and Linda B. Dupre
Nicholas v. Vannoy
as 25-30191
Petitioner:
Arthur Nicholas, III
Respondent:
Darrel Vannoy, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary
Rachal v. LA Dept Pub Sfty and Corr
as 25-30186
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Rachal
Defendant:
Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections, Timothy Hooper, Warden of Louisiana State Penitentiary, James LeBlanc, Secretary of Department of Corrections and others
Hoffman v. Westcott
as 25-70006
Plaintiff:
Jessie Hoffman
Defendant:
Gary Westcott, Secretary, Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections, Darrel Vannoy, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, In His Official Capacity and John Does, unknown executioners
Amicus Curiae:
State of Alabama
Johnson v. Vannoy
as 25-30123
Petitioner:
Saul Johnson
Respondent:
Tim Hooper, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary
In re: Gary Westcott
as 25-30088
Petitioner:
In re: Gary Westcott, Secretary, Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections and Darrel Vannoy, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, In His Official Capacity
Respondent:
Jessie Hoffman
Ricks v. State of Louisiana et al
as 3:2025cv00091
Plaintiff:
Wesley Ricks
Defendant:
State of Louisiana, Department of Corrections, Louisiana State Penitentiary and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chandler v. Hooper
as 25-30020
Petitioner:
Charles Chandler
Respondent:
Tim Hooper, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary
Thomas v. Hooper
as 24-30809
Petitioner:
Jason Thomas
Respondent:
Tim Hooper, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
