Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Houston Home Dialysis LP v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama et al
as 2:2019cv01765
Defendant:
Excellus Health Plan, Inc. d/b/a Excellus BlueCross BlueShield, Anthem Health Plans Inc, National Account Service Company, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Houston Home Dialysis LP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
Houston Home Dialysis LP v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama et al
as 4:2019cv03791
Defendant:
Excellus Health Plan, Inc. d/b/a Excellus BlueCross BlueShield, HealthNow New York, Inc., Anthem Health Plans of Kentucky, Inc. d/b/a Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kentucky and others
Plaintiff:
Houston Home Dialysis and Houston Home Dialysis LP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
In Re: Ranbaxy Generic Drug Application Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2019md02878
In Re:
Ranbaxy Generic Drug Application Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff:
Meijer, Inc., Meijer Distribution, Inc., Cesar Castillo, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Ranbaxy Laboratories Limited, Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Limited, Ranbaxy, Inc. and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
United Food and Commercial Workers Health and Welfare Fund of Northern Pennsylvania and Louisiana Health Services and Indemnity Company d/b/a Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Louisiana
Respondent:
Prinston Pharmaceutical Inc.
Interested Party:
Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation and Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals L.P.
Not Classified By Court:
Winifred Weitsen
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Cell Science Systems Corporation v. Louisiana Health Service and Indemnity Company d/b/a Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Louisiana
as 3:2017cv01657
Plaintiff:
Cell Science Systems Corporation
Defendant:
Louisiana Health Service and Indemnity Company d/b/a Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
State of Louisiana v. Fresenius Medical Care Airline et al
as 1:2016cv11035
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Louisiana Health Service and Indemnity Company d/b/a Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Louisiana
Defendant:
Fresenius Medical Care Airline , Fresenius Medical Care Amite , Fresenius Medical Care Ascension and others
Plaintiff:
State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
American Surgical Assistants, Inc. v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama et al
as 2:2016cv00775
Plaintiff:
American Surgical Assistants, Inc , Fortbend SA Services, Inc. , National SA Services, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Anthem, Inc., Health Care Service Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337
American Surgical Assistants, Inc. v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama et al
as TXS/4:16-cv-01146
Plaintiff:
American Surgical Assistants, Inc , Fortbend SA Services, Inc. , National SA Services, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama , Anthem, Inc. , Health Care Service Corporation and others
Quality Dialysis One, L.L.C., f/k/a Quality Dialysis One, L.P. v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Alabama, et al
as 2:2015cv02296
Plaintiff:
Quality Dialysis One, L.L.C. f/k/a Quality Dialysis One, L.P. and Quality Dialysis Two, L.P.
Defendant:
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Anthem, Inc., Health Care Service Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337
Quality Dialysis One, L.L.C., f/k/a Quality Dialysis One, L.P. v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Alabama, et al
as TXS/4:15-cv-03491
Plaintiff:
Quality Dialysis One, L.L.C. f/k/a Quality Dialysis One, L.P. and Quality Dialysis Two, L.P.
Defendant:
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama , Anthem, Inc. , Health Care Service Corporation and others
Quality Dialysis One, L.L.C., f/k/a Quality Dialysis One, L.P. v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Alabama, et al
as 4:2015cv03491
Plaintiff:
Quality Dialysis One, L.L.C. f/k/a Quality Dialysis One, L.P. and Quality Dialysis Two, L.P.
Defendant:
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Anthem, Inc., Health Care Service Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
