Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Roddy L. Harrell et al v. Louisville Ladder, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00615
Plaintiff:
Roddy L Harrell, Susan Frishman Harrell, Holly Harrell and others
Defendant:
Louisville Ladder, Inc. and Does 1 through 10, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Church Mutual Insurance Company v. Louisville Ladder Inc et al
as 2:2020cv10643
Defendant:
Louisville Ladder Inc and Does 1 to 30, inclusive
Plaintiff:
Church Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dickinson v. Louisville Ladder, Inc
as 2:2020cv00868
Defendant:
Louisville Ladder, Inc
Plaintiff:
Michelle Dickinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Andrew Littwin v. Louisville Ladder Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv04743
Defendant:
Does and Louisville Ladder Inc.
Plaintiff:
Andrew Littwin
Georgiou v. Louisville Ladder, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv06588
Plaintiff:
Stelious Georgiou
Defendant:
Louisville Ladder, Inc. and Amazon.com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Richard Skinner v. Louisville Ladder, Inc., et al
as 17-56060
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD SKINNER
Defendant - Appellee:
LOUISVILLE LADDER, INC., DBA Davidson Ladders, Inc. and DOES, 1-50, inclusive
Juan Chairez v. Louisville Ladder, Inc et al
as 2:2016cv07679
Plaintiff:
Juan Chairez
Defendant:
Does and Louisville Ladder, Inc.
Richard Skinner v. Louisville Ladders, Inc et al
as 2:2016cv03136
Defendant:
Does and Louisville Ladder, Inc
Plaintiff:
Richard Skinner
Michael Dybnis, et al v. Louisville Ladder, Inc.
as 13-56047
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MICHAEL DYBNIS, BARBARA DYBNIS, individually and as successor in interest for Successor Sacha Dybnis and ARI DYBNIS
Defendant - Appellant:
LOUISVILLE LADDER, INC., FKA Davidson Ladders, Inc.
Selene Martinez v. Louisville Ladder Company et al
as 5:2013cv00325
Defendant:
Does, Louisville Ladder Company, Roes and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
Louisville Ladder Inc and Roes
Plaintiff:
Selene Martinez
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
Target Corporation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
