Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Drews v. Eagan et al
as 2:2023cv01648
Plaintiff:
Michael G A Drews and Michael G Drews
Defendant:
Sgt Eagan, CO Gomez, CO Beekman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cristobal Cervantes v. D. Stickies et al
as 5:2022cv00384
Plaintiff:
Cristobal Cervantes
Defendant:
Captain D. Stickies, Lt. McCoy, Lt. A. Valli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coll v. Alamia et al
as 1:2021cv03712
Plaintiff:
Brian J. Coll
Defendant:
Hank Alamia, CO Thomas, CO Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Drumgo, Sr. v. Reese et al
as 3:2020cv02434
Defendant:
C.O. Tedesco, Lt. McCoy, Major Wudner and others
Plaintiff:
DeShawn D. Drumgo, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Dobbs et al
as 8:2020cv02925
Defendant:
Lt. McCoy, Ms Evans, Mr Morrell and others
Plaintiff:
Leonard Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doub v. Brittian et al
as 1:2019cv01915
Defendant:
LT. McCoy, Holly, Brittian and others
Plaintiff:
Ulysses Doub
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hicks v. Virginia Department Of Corrections et al
as 7:2012cv00069
Respondent:
Harold Clark, John S. Garman, R. C. Mathena and others
Petitioner:
Deonta Hicks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barbour v. VDOC et al
as 7:2012cv00070
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Edward Barbour
Defendant:
Director, VDOC Western Regional, Seg. Gibson, Lt. McCoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Koklich v. Yates et al
as 1:2011at00561
Defendant:
James A. Yates, P. Mendoza, Mr. Chamness and others
Plaintiff:
Bruce Koklich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Koklich v. California Department of Corrections & Rebiliatation et al
as 1:2011at00503
Plaintiff:
Bruce Koklich
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections & Rebiliatation , James A. Yates , P. Mendoza and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
