Cases 1 - 10 of 114
Frederick v. AT&T Corp et al
as 2:2022cv03824
Plaintiff:
Gilda Frederick
Defendant:
Nokia of America Corporation, AT&T Corporation, Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Phillips v. Lucent Technologies, Inc. Pension Plan
as 1:2021cv00029
Plaintiff:
Mary Phillips
Defendant:
Lucent Technologies, Inc. Pension Plan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Stepanek v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 1:2019cv02642
Plaintiff:
John F Stepanek
Defendant:
Imerys Talc America, Inc., Riley Power Inc., Plastics Engineering Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452
Mitchell v. Lucent Technologies Inc. Pension Plan et al
as 1:2017cv08097
Plaintiff:
Curtis A. Mitchell
Defendant:
Lucent Technologies Inc. Pension Plan , Lisa P. Ramsthaler , Alacatel-Lucent USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
William Davidson, et al v. Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc., et al
as 16-17252
Plaintiff - Appellee:
WILLIAM DAVIDSON and PEARL DAVIDSON
Defendant - Appellant:
ALCATEL-LUCENT USA INC., as successor in-interest to Bell Telephone Laboratories, Inc.and Western Electric Compnay Inc., AKA Bell Laboratories, AKA Bell Labs, AKA BTL, FKA Lucent Technologies, Inc., AT&T CORP., individually and as successor in interest to Pacific Bell Telephone Company, Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Company, Bell Telephone Laboratories, Inc. AT&T Long Lines and Western Electric Company Inc., AKA Bell Laboratories, AKA Bell Labs, AKA and PACIFIC BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, individually and as successor in interest to Pacific Bell Telephone Company, Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Company, Bell Telephone Laboratories, Inc., AT&T Long Lines and Western Electric Company Inc., AKA Bell Laboratories
Defendant:
NOKIA USA INC., individually and as successor in interest to Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc., Bell Telephone Laboratories, Inc. and Western Electric Company Inc.
Alcatel-lucent USA Inc. et al v. Neeley
as 1:2016mc00046
Plaintiff:
Alcatel-lucent USA Inc., Alcatel-Lucent Retirement Income Plan and Lucent Technologies Inc. Pension Plan
Defendant:
Pamela Neeley
Drummond et al v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al
as 1:2016cv11614
Plaintiff:
Theodore G. Drummond and Patricia Drummond
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company , Clifton Associates, Inc., Eckel Industries Inc. and others
Cross_claimant:
Roth Pump Company , Metropolitan Life Insurance Company , General Electric Company and others
Cross_defendant:
API Heat Transfer Inc. a/k/a API Heat Transfer Electric Heater Company, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation as successor by merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc. , Alfa Laval, Inc. individually and as successor to The DeLaval Separator Co. and Sharples, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Kennedy v. Inc. Long Term Disability Plan for Management or LBA Employees et al
as 1:2015cv08839
Plaintiff:
Tina Kennedy
Defendant:
Lucent Technologies Inc. Long Term Disability Plan for Management or LBA Employees and Connecticut General Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Bertini et al v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al
as 1:2015cv13491
Plaintiff:
Albert M. Bertini and Alice Bertini
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation , Eastern Refractories Company, Inc. and others
Cross_claimant:
Marotta Controls, Inc. , General Electric Company , Nibco, Inc. and others
Cross_defendant:
A.W. Chesterton Company, Aetna Marine Corporation, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation as successor by merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Cady v. Foster Wheeler LLC
as 1:2015cv11900
Defendant:
Foster Wheeler LLC , Metropolitan Life Insurance Company , General Dynamics Corporation and others
Cross_claimant:
Foster Wheeler LLC , General Electric Company , Nibco, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Michael P Cady and Andrea Cady
Cross_defendant:
General Electric Company , A.W. Chesterton Company, API Heat Transfer Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
