Cases filed in New Jersey
ALCATEL-LUCENT USA INC. et al v. BORLABI et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2013cv04543
Plaintiff: ALCATEL-LUCENT USA INC. , ALCATEL-LUCENT RETIREMENT INCOME PLAN and LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES INC. PENSION PLAN
Defendant: SAMUEL BORLABI, ALBERT BROWN, OSCAR CALDERON and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
FUNK v. CIGNA GROUP INSURANCE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv05208
Plaintiff: ROBERT FUNK
Defendant: CIGNA GROUP INSURANCE, LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES INC., LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN FOR MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Type: Labor None
COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO v. LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv03512
Plaintiff: COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO
Defendant: LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ALCATEL LUCENT SA, ALCATEL LUCENT HOLDINGS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Labor None
COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO v. LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
as 2:2007cv06037
Plaintiff: COMMUNICATIONS WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO
Defendant: LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Employee Pension Plan
PREFERRED REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS, LLC v. LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv05374
Plaintiff: PREFERRED REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS, LLC
Defendant: LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and LTI NJ FINANCE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
FINNEGAN et al v. LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv03261
Plaintiff: RICHARD FINNEGAN, ROLF CRACKAU, EUGENIE CURTZE and others
Defendant: LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and RAYTHEON COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
LAMBRIGHT et al v. LUCENT RETIREMENT INCOME PLAN, THE et al
as 2:2007cv00468
Plaintiff: TERRY LAMBRIGHT and JAMES JACKSON
Defendant: LUCENT RETIREMENT INCOME PLAN, THE, THE PLAN COMMITTE AND ADMINISTRATIOR OF THE LUCENT RETIREMENT INCOME PLAN and LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
ALEXE v. LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES INC.
as 3:2007cv00453
Plaintiff: DANA-SORANA ALEXE
Defendant: LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMEN, et al v. AMERICAN THERMOPLAST, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:1998cv04781
Plaintiff: NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION , ADMINISTRATOR, NEW JERSEY SPILL COMPENSATION FUND and KASPER DISPOSAL SERVICE
Defendant: AMERICAN THERMOPLASTICS CORP. , CADILLAC PLASTICS GROUP, INC. , CHEMICAL WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC and others
Counter_claimant: COMPACTION SYSTEMS CORPORATION , COMPACTION SYSTEMS CORPORATION OF CONNECTICUT, INC. , OCCIDENTAL PETROLEUM COMPANY and others
Cross_claimant: OCCIDENTAL PETROLEUM COMPANY , MENNEN COMPANY , WARNER LAMBERT COMPANY, INC. and others
Third_party_plaintiff: AMERICAN THERMOPLASTICS CORP. , CADILLAC PLASTICS GROUP, INC. , CHEMICAL WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC and others
Third_party_defendant: AIR PRODUCTS & CHEMICALS, INC. , ALLIEDSIGNAL, INC. , BP EXPLORATION & OIL INC. and others
Plaintiff_consolidated: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant_consolidated: PHILLIPS PETROLEUM COMPANY , DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION and EAGLE INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS, INC.
Counter_claimant_consolidated: PHILLIPS PETROLEUM, INC. and FALCON MANUFACTURING , INC.
Movant: COOPERATIVE DISPOSAL CO. and M & H SERVICES
Fourthparty_plaintiff: HOECHST CELANESE CORP.
Fourthparty_defendant: STATEWIDE ENVIRONMENTAL CONTRACTORS, INC.
Third_party_plaintiff_consolidated: COMPACTION SYSTEMS CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY and EAGLE INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS, INC.
Third_party_defendant_consolidated: ELASTIMOLD CORPORATION , NATIONAL STARCH & CO and THE NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF LAW AND PUBLIC SAFETY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 6901

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?