Cases 1 - 10 of 90
Hooks vs Lopez-Rivero, et al
as 2:2024cv00619
Defendant:
Antonay Arnetta Hooks, Lyft, Inc. and Jose Luis Lopez-Rivero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-55556
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
(PC) Johnson v. Wilson et al
as 1:2023cv00623
Plaintiff:
Phillip Joseph Johnson
Defendant:
Randolph Wilson, Danny Negrete, Michael Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Johnson v. Wilson et al
as 2:2023cv00729
Plaintiff:
Phillip Joseph Johnson
Defendant:
Randolph Wilson, Danny Negrete, Michael Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jose Luis Lopez-Galindo v. Ixco et al
as 5:2023cv00653
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Lopez-Galindo and Jose Ruiz Lopez
Defendant:
Ixco, M. Manker, Mastel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Johnson v. Wilson et al
as 2:2023cv00557
Plaintiff:
Phillip Joseph Johnson
Defendant:
Randolph Wilson, Michael Gonzalez, Randy Barcena and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv02189
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Miller et al v. Bonta et al
as 3:2022cv01446
Plaintiff:
James Miller, Ryan Peterson, Gunfighter Tactical, LLC and others
Defendant:
Rob Bonta and Luis Lopez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cvp Civil Rights (Personal Property)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv05383
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Lopez v. Shinn
as 4:2022cv00401
Petitioner:
Xavier Luis Lopez
Respondent:
David Shinn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
