Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Tapia et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2023cv01552
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Tapia and Yuritzy Tapia
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Tapia et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2023at00929
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Tapia and Yuritzy Tapia
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Tapia-Fierro v. Garland
as 23-312
Petitioner:
JOSE LUIS TAPIA-FIERRO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Tapia v. Shinn et al
as 2:2023cv00281
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Tapia
Defendant:
David Shinn, Unknown Posey, Unknown Bresan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fierro v. Arizona, State of
as 2:2022cv00153
Petitioner:
Jose Luis Tapia Fierro
Respondent:
Arizona, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Arana-Santiago v. Tapia-Maldonado, et al
as 21-1625
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DR. LUIS S. ARANA-SANTIAGO
Debtor / Appellee:
LUIS TAPIA-MALDONADO
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSE HEREDIA-RODRIGUEZ, VIVIAN VELEZ-VERA and MARISOL DIAZ-OCASIO
Defendant:
MARIA RODRIGUEZ-SIERRA
Jose Tapia-Fierro v. Merrick Garland, et al
as 21-16255
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSE LUIS TAPIA-FIERRO, AKA Jose Tapia
Defendant / Appellee:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General and ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, DHS Secretary
Fierro v. Garland et al
as 2:2021cv00814
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Tapia Fierro
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas and Merrick B Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jose Tapia-Fierro v. Leon Wilmot
as 21-15782
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSE LUIS TAPIA-FIERRO, AKA Jose Tapia
Defendant / Appellee:
LEON N. WILMOT, Yuma County Sheriff
Arana-Santiago v. University of Puerto Rico et al
as 3:2021cv01172
Plaintiff:
Dr. Luis S. Arana-Santiago
Defendant:
Luis Tapia-Maldonado, Jorge Haddock-Acevedo and University of Puerto Rico
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
