Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Stubbs, III v. Luzerne County, Pennsylvania
as 1:2023cv01114
Plaintiff:
Henry Christopher Stubbs, III
Defendant:
Luzerne County, Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
City of Nanticoke, Pennsylvania et al v. McKinsey and Company, Inc.
as 3:2021cv09835
Plaintiff:
City of Nanticoke, Pennsylvania, City of Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania, Columbia County, Pennsylvania and others
Defendant:
McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
City of Nanticoke, Pennsylvania et al v. McKinsey and Company, Inc.
as 3:2021cv01958
Plaintiff:
City of Nanticoke, Pennsylvania, City of Wilkes-Barre, Pennsylvania, Columbia County, Pennsylvania and others
Defendant:
McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
PennEast Pipeline Company, LLC v. A PERMANENT EASEMENT OF 0.16 ACRE AND A TEMPORARY EASEMENT OF 0.38 ACRE IN BEAR CREEK TOWNSHIP, LUZERNE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, TAX PARCEL NO. 04-H11-00A-030-000 et al
as 3:2019cv00463
Defendant:
A PERMANENT EASEMENT OF 0.16 ACRE AND A TEMPORARY EASEMENT OF 0.38 ACRE IN BEAR CREEK TOWNSHIP, LUZERNE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, TAX PARCEL NO. 04-H11-00A-030-000, Unknown Heirs of Mary A. Kresge, All Unknown Owners and others
Plaintiff:
PennEast Pipeline Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
PennEast Pipeline Company, LLC v. A Permanent Easement of 0.48 Acre +, A Permanent Facilities Easement of 0.07 Acre +, and A Temporary Easement of 0.07 Acre + in Dallas Township, Luzerne County, Pennsylvania, Tax Parcel No. 10-D8-00A- et al
as 3:2019cv00466
Defendant:
Regency NEPA Gas Gathering LLC, All Unknown Owners and A Permanent Easement of 0.48 Acre +, A Permanent Facilities Easement of 0.07 Acre +, and A Temporary Easement of 0.07 Acre + in Dallas Township, Luzerne County, Pennsylvania, Tax Parcel No. 10-D8-00A-
Plaintiff:
PennEast Pipeline Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
PennEast Pipeline Company, LLC v. A TEMPORARY EASEMENT OF 0.58 ACRE IN JENKINS TOWNSHIP, LUZERNE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, TAX PARCEL NO. 33-F10S3-002-007-000 et al
as 3:2019cv00467
Defendant:
Harry Salavantis, All Unknown Owners and A TEMPORARY EASEMENT OF 0.58 ACRE IN JENKINS TOWNSHIP, LUZERNE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, TAX PARCEL NO. 33-F10S3-002-007-000
Plaintiff:
PennEast Pipeline Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
PennEast Pipeline Company, LLC v. A PERMANENT EASEMENT OF 0.13 ACRE IN KINGSTON TOWNSHIP, LUZERNE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, TAX PARCEL NO. 35-E9-00A-032-000 et al
as 3:2019cv00465
Defendant:
All Unknown Owners, A PERMANENT EASEMENT OF 0.13 ACRE IN KINGSTON TOWNSHIP, LUZERNE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA, TAX PARCEL NO. 35-E9-00A-032-000, Janice Metzo and others
Plaintiff:
PennEast Pipeline Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Kush v. Bayview Loan Servicing et al
as 3:2018cv01483
Defendant:
Bayview Loan Servicing, WB General Hospital Commonwealth Health Union, The Court of Common Pleas of Luzerne County, Pennsylvania and others
Plaintiff:
Amy Kush
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PennEast Pipeline Company, LLC v. A Permanent Easement of 0.02 acre et al
as 3:2018cv00293
Plaintiff:
PennEast Pipeline Company, LLC
Defendant:
A Permanent Easement of 0.02 acre +/- and a Temporary Easement of 0.02 acre +/- in Plains Township, Luzerne County, Pennsylvania, Tax Parcel No. 35-E9-00A-51J-000 , Jeffrey L. Mullen and Manufacturers & Traders Trust Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
PennEast Pipeline Company, LLC v. A Permanent Easement of 0.23 acre +/- and a temporary easement of 1.06 acres +/- in Jenkins Township, Luzerne County, Pennsylvania, Tax Parcel No. 33-F10-00A-07E-000 et al
as 3:2018cv00289
Plaintiff:
PennEast Pipeline Company, LLC
Defendant:
A Permanent Easement of 0.23 acre +/- and a temporary easement of 1.06 acres +/- in Jenkins Township, Luzerne County, Pennsylvania, Tax Parcel No. 33-F10-00A-07E-000, Elizabeth M. Milazzo and All Unknown Owners
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
