Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Hooks vs Lopez-Rivero, et al
as 2:2024cv00619
Defendant:
Antonay Arnetta Hooks, Lyft, Inc. and Jose Luis Lopez-Rivero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
State of Nevada, Department of Employment Training and Rehabilitation ex. rel. Chagolla v. Lyft, Inc.,
as 3:2023cv00442
Plaintiff:
State of Nevada, Department of Employment Training and Rehabilitation ex. rel. Chagolla
Defendant:
Lyft, Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Woods et al v. Lyft, Inc.
as 2:2023cv00807
Plaintiff:
Lillian Woods and Melinda Hotchkins
Defendant:
Lyft, Inc. and Estate of Romualdo Barrientos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death
NOT USED
as 2:2023cv00806
Plaintiff:
Lillian Woods and Melinda Hotchkins
Defendant:
Lyft, Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
NOT USED
as 2:2023cv00804
Plaintiff:
Lillian Woods
Defendant:
Melinda Hotchkins and Lyft, Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
NOT USED
as 2:2023cv00805
Defendant:
Lyft, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Chipman v. Lyft, Inc.
as 2:2023cv00761
Plaintiff:
James Chipman
Defendant:
Lyft, Inc. and United Financial Casualty Company (Progressive Insurance Company)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
CT Belt-Wright v. Lyft, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00400
Defendant:
Lyft, Inc., CT Belt-Wright, U-Haul Co. of California and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Hardison v. Castro et al
as 2:2023cv00056
Plaintiff:
Anthony Hardison
Defendant:
Paula Andrea Bedoya Castro and Lyft, Inc. doing business as Lyft
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Bell v. Lyft, Inc.,
as 2:2023cv00041
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bell
Defendant:
Lyft, Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
