Cases 1 - 10 of 12
NAACP v. Tindell
as 23-60647
Plaintiff:
National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, NAACP, Mississippi State Conference of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, Mississippi NAACP, Jackson City Branch of the NAACP, Jackson NAACP and others
Defendant:
Sean Tindell, in his official capacity as Commissioner of Public Safety, Bo Luckey, in his official capacity as Chief of the Mississippi Department of Public Safety Office of Capitol Police, Lynn Fitch, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Mississippi and others
The State of Mississippi, Ex Rel. Lynn Fitch Attorney General v. Eli Lilly and Company et al
as 2:2023cv04364
Defendant:
EVERNORTH HEALTH INC., ELI LILLY AND COMPANY, NOVO NORDISK INC. and others
In Re:
INSULIN PRICING LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
The State of Mississippi, Ex Rel. Lynn Fitch Attorney General
Respondent:
Zinc Health Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
National Association for the Advancement of Colored People et al v. Reeves et al
as 3:2023cv00272
Plaintiff:
National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, Mississippi State Conference of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, Jackson City Branch of the NAACP and others
Defendant:
Tate Reeves, Sean Tindell, Bo Luckey and others
Petitioner:
JXN Undivided Coalition, Mississippi Votes, PEOPLES ADVOCACY INSTITUTE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bey v. Thompson et al
as 3:2023cv00012
Plaintiff:
Richard Amun'Ra Bey
Defendant:
Bennie Thompson, Tate Reeves, Lynn Fitch and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
State of Louisiana v. Biden
as 22-30087
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of Louisiana, by and through its Attorney General, Jeff Landry, State of Alabama, by and through its Attorney General, Steve Marchall, State of Florida, by and through its Attorney General, Ashley Moody and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., in his official capacity as President of the United States, Cecilia Rouse, in her official capacity as Chairwoman of the Council of Economic Advisers, Shalanda Young, in her official capacity as Acting Director of the Office of Management and Budget and others
The State of Mississippi, Ex Rel. Lynn Fitch Attorney General v. Eli Lilly and Company et al
as MSS/3:21-CV-00674
Plaintiff:
The State of Mississippi, Ex Rel. Lynn Fitch Attorney General
Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Company
The State of Mississippi, Ex Rel. Lynn Fitch Attorney General v. Eli Lilly and Company et al
as 3:2021cv00674
Defendant:
Evernorth Health, Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, Novo Nordisk Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
The State of Mississippi, Ex Rel. Lynn Fitch Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Thomas v. Reeves
as 21-60171
Defendant / Appellant:
Michael Watson, Secretary of State of the State of Mississippi, all in the official capacities of their own offices and in their official capacities as members of the State Board of Election Commissioners, Tate Reeves, Governor of the State of Mississippi, all in the official capacities of their own offices and in their official capacities as members of the State Board of Election Commissioners and Lynn Fitch, Attorney General of the State of Mississippi, all in the official capacities of their own offices and in their official capacities as members of the State Board of Election Commissioners
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Joseph Thomas, Vernon Ayers and Melvin Lawson
Watson v. Watson
as 3:2021cv00026
Defendant:
Mary Carole Brand Watson
Plaintiff:
John Kevin Watson
Intervenor:
State of Mississippi ex rel. Attorney General Lynn Fitch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Get Glam Beauty, LLC v. Stewart et al
as 3:2020cv00580
Defendant:
Lynn Fitch, Dorothy Ennis, Hilda Bills and others
Plaintiff:
Karrece Stewart and Get Glam Beauty, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
