Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Twoguns v. M&T Bank Corporation
as 1:2023cv00892
Plaintiff:
Monica Twoguns
Defendant:
M&T Bank Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
DUFF et al v. M&T BANK et al
as 2:2023cv01612
Plaintiff:
KATHLEEN M. DUFF, BEVERLY DUFFY and MICHAEL F. DUFFY, SR.
Defendant:
M&T BANK and LAKEVIEW LOAN SERVICING
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Murphy et al v. Taylor et al
as 1:2022cv01730
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Murphy and Deborah Adams-Murphy
Defendant:
Charles Taylor, Katherine Renner, John Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 fr Fed. Question: Fraud
AIKINS v. M&T BANK et al
as 1:2022cv02610
Plaintiff:
BRUCE AIKINS
Defendant:
M&T BANK, ETC EQUITIES and PNC BANK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Michael Siano v. M&T Bank, et al
as 22-1205
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL PATRICK SIANO
Defendant / Appellee:
M&T BANK and PARKER MCCAY
MARSHALL v. MANUFACTURERS AND TRADERS TRUST COMPANY et al
as 2:2020cv19421
Defendant:
MANUFACTURERS AND TRADERS TRUST COMPANY, HOMEBRIDGE FINANCIAL SERVICES INC., CENTRAL LOAN ADMINISTRATION AND REPORTING and others
Plaintiff:
PSAHAY N. MARSHALL
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
SIANO v. M&T BANK et al
as 3:2020cv12827
Defendant:
PARKER MCCAYP.A. LAW OFFICES, M&T BANK, UNKNOWN PARTIES and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PATRICK SIANO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stokes v. M&T Bank et al (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG+)
as 2:2018cv00049
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Stokes, III
Defendant:
M&T Bank and Barrett Daffin Frappier Turner & Engel, LLP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
KIM et al v. M&T BANK
as 2:2017cv11810
Defendant:
M&T BANK
Plaintiff:
YOUNG MAN KIM , KENNETH RHEE and KKR PARTNERS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kallon v. M&T Bank et al
as 8:2017cv02752
Plaintiff:
Sheku M. Kallon, Jr.
Defendant:
M&T Bank, Bayview Loan Mortgage Servicing and SunTrust Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
