Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Cauz v. LeFever
as 1:2023cv00126
Petitioner:
Javier Capote Cauz
Respondent:
Department of Homeland Security Immigration and Customs Enforcement and M. M. LeFever
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Cauz v. LeFever
as 1:2023cv00087
Petitioner:
Javier Capote Cauz
Respondent:
M. M. LeFever
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv23703
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Conner v. Doe et al
as 1:2021cv00366
Defendant:
James E. Parks, Nikita B. Murphy, K. Breeding and others
Plaintiff:
Reginald T. Conner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Christian v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2021cv00305
Defendant:
E Nze, R Ablog, L Kaiser and others
Plaintiff:
Earl Dean Christian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meister v. US Department of Justice et al
as 5:2020ct03295
Defendant:
Warden D. Smith, C/M M. Swanagin, AM McDaniels and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Meister
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Christian v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 5:2020cv06483
Defendant:
E Nze, R Ablog, R C Younger and others
Plaintiff:
Earl Dean Christian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
POSTEMICE v. MAIORANA et al
as 3:2019cv03649
Defendant:
C MAIORANA, M M NEAL, K CARTER and others
Plaintiff:
JEREMIAH G POSTEMICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCALLISTER v. WINSTON-SALEM POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2019cv00013
Defendant:
SGT D. T. LENTZ, CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM, T. N. BRANCH and others
Plaintiff:
ANTON THURMAN MCALLISTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilkins v. McGinley et al
as 5:2018cv01238
Defendant:
M. M. McGinley, Paul Elizondo, Dr. FNU Yao and others
Plaintiff:
James Wilkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
