Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Nobles v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02935
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Chablis M Nobles
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Eugene Baker, et al v. Blackhawk Mining, LLC, et al
as 24-5490
Plaintiff:
BILLY JOE MULLINS, VADA BAKER, LESTER BAKER and others
Defendant:
BLACKHAWK MINING, LLC and PINE BRANCH MINING, LLC
Michael DeSpain v. Louisville Metropolitan Government, et al
as 21-6237
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL DESPAIN and MICHAEL R. DESPAIN
Defendant / Appellee:
LOUISVILLE METRO GOVERNMENT, STEVE CONRAD, Chief of Police, LIEUTENANT KIT STEMILE and others
Noble v. The City of Beaumont
as 1:2020cv00400
Plaintiff:
Lizabeth M Noble
Defendant:
The City of Beaumont
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Watford et al v. Edwards et al
as 6:2020cv06756
Defendant:
Connor Edwards, City of Rochester, Police Officer Derek Sterling and others
Plaintiff:
Dashonda D Watford, Jesse M Noble, Jusmeir Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
B and M Noble Co. et al v. Old Master Products, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv08145
Plaintiff:
3D Coverings LLC and B and M Noble Co.
Defendant:
Does 1 through 10, inclusive, Old Master Products, Inc. and Does 1 through 25, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Noble et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv02676
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Roseann M Noble and Herman Noble
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SANDERS v. BECK
as 1:2017cv00270
Plaintiff:
STEVEN GARY SANDERS
Defendant:
WILLIAM BECK, CLAIRE M NOBLE, LYNN E SHIPMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Noble v. Colvin
as 2:2015cv01376
Plaintiff:
Kelly M Noble
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
DHF, LLC v. B&M Noble Co.
as 1:2015cv00255
Defendant:
B&M Noble Co.
Plaintiff:
DHF, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
