Cases 1 - 10 of 60
Taylor v. Oakes et al
as 3:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
Daren M Taylor
Defendant:
Stacy Oakes, Michael Parris and Brandon Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Berry v. City of Detroit et al
as 2:2024cv10282
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Berry
Defendant:
Detroit, City of, Aaron Lewber, Bryan Borowski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jeffers v. Hanson & Adkins Transport, Inc et al (TV1)
as 3:2022cv00450
Plaintiff:
Tommy Jeffers
Defendant:
Hanson & Adkins Transport, Inc and Larry M Taylor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00519
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Marvin Gerber v. Henry Herskovitz, et al
as 22-1097
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARVIN GERBER
Defendant / Appellee:
HENRY HERSKOVITZ, GLORIA HARB, TOM SAFFOLD and others
Marvin Gerber, et al v. Henry Herskovitz, et al
as 22-1075
Plaintiff:
MARVIN GERBER
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DOCTOR MIRIAM BRYSK
Defendant / Appellee:
HENRY HERSKOVITZ, GLORIA HARB, TOM SAFFOLD and others
Taylor v. Saul
as 2:2020cv12803
Plaintiff:
Marcina M. Taylor
Defendant:
Commissioner Andrew Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Taylor v. Baker et al
as 3:2020cv00647
Defendant:
Director Dewayne Clark and Deputy Director Martin Baker
Plaintiff:
Dewight M. Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marvin Gerber, et al v. Henry Herskovitz, et al
as 20-1870
Defendant / Appellee:
DEREK DELACOURT, in his official and individual capacities, KRISTEN D. LARCOM, in her official and individual capacities, RUBY LIST and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARVIN GERBER and DOCTOR MIRIAM BRYSK
Taylor v. Clark et al
as 3:2020cv00596
Defendant:
Martin Baker and Dewayne Clark
Plaintiff:
Dewight M. Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
