Cases 1 - 10 of 3,300
Donovin Last v. M-I, L.L.C.
as 1:2020cv01205
Plaintiff:
Donovin Last
Defendant:
M-I, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
M-I L.L.C. v. Q'Max Solutions, Inc. et al
as 4:2018cv01099
Plaintiff:
M-I L.L.C.
Defendant:
Q'Max Solutions, Inc. , Q'Max America, Inc. , Sanjit Roy and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Bocage v. M-I, L.L.C.
as 2:2017cv06124
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Bocage
Defendant:
M-I, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
OHA Investment Corporation v. Bennu Oil & Gas, L.L.C., et al
as 17-20224
Appellee:
OHA INVESTMENT CORPORATION, formerly known as NGP Capital Resources Company
Appellant:
SCHLUMBERGER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, WIRELINE CONTROL SERVICES, L.L.C., SMITH INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED and others
Bedwell v. M-I, L.L.C. et al
as 2:2016cv15606
Plaintiff:
Barney Bedwell
Defendant:
M-I, L.L.C., Schlumberger Technology Corporation and Schlumberger Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv02556
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv01514
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Matthew Dewan, et al v. M-I, L.L.C.
as 16-20182
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MATTHEW DEWAN, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated and WILLIAM J. CASEY
Defendant - Appellee:
M-I, L.L.C., doing business as M-I SWACO
Dewan, et al v. M-I, L.L.C.
as 4:2015cv01746
Plaintiff:
Matthew Dewan
Defendant:
M-I, L.L.C. , Smith International Acquisition Corp. and Schlumberger Technology Corp
Intervenor:
Sarmad Syed and Ashley Balfour
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
