Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Kearns v. Dudek
as 1:2025cv02140
Plaintiff:
Jennifer M. Kearns
Defendant:
Leland Dudek
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
KEARNS et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv15072
Plaintiff:
LISA M. KEARNS and BRIAN KEARNS
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC, KENVUE, INC. and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Patrick Kearns, et al v. United States
as 20-2346
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jeffery Dettbarn and Patrick M. Kearns
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America
Kearns et al v. Rideout
as 3:2019cv00042
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Dettbarn, Patrick M Kearns and Patrick M. Kearns
Defendant:
David Rideout
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 t
Mitchell v. Cusic et al
as 2:2016cv02087
Plaintiff:
Norman Lester Mitchell
Defendant:
M. Cusic, M. Kearns and M. Enos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Kearns et al
as 5:2012cv00162
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Robert M. Kearns, Tina P. Kearns and Capital One Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Kearns v. Astrue
as 4:2010cv00385
Plaintiff:
Christopher M. Kearns
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
KEARNS v. HUNTERS GLEN APARTMENTS et al
as 3:2009cv03092
Plaintiff:
ERIN M. KEARNS
Defendant:
HUNTERS GLEN APARTMENTS, OP PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC and JOHN DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv01721
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Dermanatale Inc v. Kearns et al
as 3:2007cv01578
Plaintiff:
Dermanatale Inc
Defendant:
Kenneth M. Kearns and Barbara K. Kearns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
