Cases 1 - 10 of 59
Gochnour v. Burri
as 19-1091
Defendant:
M. Hadfield, Mr. Chaffer, W. Sidel and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Michael John Gochnour
Defendant / Appellee:
Douglas J. Lynch, Arthur M. White, Chad B. Turner and others
Harriott v. Annucci
as 18-879
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Albert Harriott
Defendant - Appellee:
Anthony J. Annucci, Acting Commissioner of the New York Department of Corrections, M. Sheahan, Superintendent with NY DOCS, John Colvin, Superintendent of Security with NY DOCS and others
Defendant:
John Doe, #1 Correctional Officer of Five Points Correctional Facility, Jane Doe, #2 Nurse of Five Points Correctional Facility, John Doe, Doctor of Five Points Correctional Facility and others
Viera v. Annucci et al
as 6:2017cv06844
Plaintiff:
Terell Viera
Defendant:
Anthony Annucci, M. Sheahan, B. Carmack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dupleasis v. Sheahan
as 17-1990
Petitioner - Appellant:
Hillery Marcus Dupleasis
Respondent - Appellee:
M. Sheahan, Superintendent
Hogan v. Ault et al
as 6:2016cv06816
Plaintiff:
John Hogan
Defendant:
Ault, Battisti, Masner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Viera v. Sheahan
as 1:2016cv04048
Respondent:
M. Sheahan
Petitioner:
Terell Viera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mohammad v. Sheahan et al
as 6:2016cv06272
Plaintiff:
Malik Mohammad
Defendant:
M. Sheahan and J.P. Rafferty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Benitez v. Salotti et al
as 6:2016cv06219
Plaintiff:
Henry Benitez
Defendant:
K. Salotti, T. Jenkins, K. Reynolds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tuszynski v. Sheahan
as 9:2016cv00296
Petitioner:
Dean Tuszynski
Respondent:
M. Sheahan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Tuszynski v. Sheahan
as 6:2016cv06047
Petitioner:
Dean Tuszynski
Defendant:
M. Sheahan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
