Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Tina Turner v. City of Chicago, et al
as 21-2599
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TINA TURNER
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF CHICAGO and KIMBERLY M. FOXX, Cook County State Attorney
Campbell v. Bennett et al
as 4:2020cv00309
Defendant:
Clerk Patricia S. Connor, Ms. Christa T. Bell, David Hamilton and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Randall Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Campbell v. Hollie Bennett
as 19-2149
Defendant / Appellee:
MS. CATHERINE A. STONE, MR. CHARLTON B. HALL, MR. DEAN GRIGG and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES R. CAMPBELL
Campbell v. Bennett et al
as 0:2019cv00973
Defendant:
Ms. Christa T. Bell, Mr. David B. Love, South Carolina Bar and others
Plaintiff:
Charles R. Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jeffrey Franklin v. Lewis, et al
as 17-16147
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY ANTHONY FRANKLIN
Defendant - Appellee:
G. D. LEWIS, Warden, M. A. COOK, P. J. SMITH and others
Wright, Jason v. Sauk County Sheriff Dept of Corrections et al
as 3:2016cv00119
Plaintiff:
Jason Lee Wright
Defendant:
Sauk County Sheriff Dept of Corrections, Sauk County Public Defenders Office, Sauk County Dept of Corrections Unit #811 Parole and Probation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jose Morales v. PBSP, et al
as 14-15071
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSE LUIS MORALES
Defendant:
PELICAN BAY STATE PRISON
Defendant - Appellee:
FERGUSON, COLEMAN, JACQUEZ and others
Gray v. Lewis et al
as 3:2013cv04929
Plaintiff:
Bernardos Gray
Defendant:
G. D. Lewis, R. Losacco, M. A. Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Franklin et al v. Lewis et al
as 3:2013cv03777
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Anthony Franklin
Defendant:
G. D. Lewis , M. A. Cook , P. J. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jimmy Williamson v. Matthew Cate, et al
as 13-16288
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JIMMY RAY WILLIAMSON
Defendant - Appellee:
MATTHEW L. CATE, GREG D. LEWIS, SCOTT KERNAN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
