Cases 1 - 7 of 7
D. v. Buckner et al
as 2:2022cv00449
Plaintiff:
M. D.
Defendant:
Nancy Buckner and Allison Bryars
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
M-D Medical Services, Inc. v. M.A.S.H. Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00829
Defendant:
M.A.S.H., Inc., Gregory L Horn and Charles Bordenca
Plaintiff:
M-D Medical Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
M-D Medical Services, Inc. v. M.A.S.H., Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00390
Defendant:
M.A.S.H., Inc., Gregory L. Horn and Charles Bordenca
Plaintiff:
M-D Medical Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. North American Company for Life and Health Insurance
as 2:2016cv00213
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Davis
Defendant:
North American Company for Life and Health Insurance
Counter_claimant:
North American Company for Life and Health Insurance
Counter_defendant:
Jennifer Davis
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
North American Company for Life and Health Insurance
Thirdparty_defendant:
M. D. and J. D.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sallee et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 2:2013cv00806
Plaintiff:
Tara D. Sallee and Ed Parish, Jr.
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company, Bridgestone Americas, Inc., Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations, LLC doing business as Firestone and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Sallee et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 2:2012cv01086
Plaintiff:
Tara D. Sallee and Mary Coleman
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company, Bridgestone Americas, Inc., Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations, LLC doing business as Firestone and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
M.D.P., et al v. Houston County Health Care Authority, et al
as 1:2011cv00461
Plaintiff:
M. D. P. , Gavin J. Pugh and Abby Nicole Pugh
Defendant:
Houston County Health Care Authority, Dothan OBGYN, Inc., Guy Malcolm Middleton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
