Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Dunlap v. Department of Justice et al
as 7:2022cv00075
Plaintiff:
Anttwaine M. Dunlap
Defendant:
Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons and United States Probation Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
DUNLAP v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2021cv03055
Plaintiff:
ANTTWAINE M. DUNLAP
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and UNITED STATES PROBATION DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2019cv06934
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harold Taylor v. Dean Borders et al
as 5:2018cv02488
Defendant:
Isaac Morales, S. Almosara, California Institution For Men and others
Plaintiff:
David M. Ziemke, Bruce Koklich, Ronald E. Austin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arlie et al v. Denka Performance Elastomer LLC et al
as 2:2018cv07017
Plaintiff:
Leah T Williams, Demoine D Gross, Lisa A Simoneaux and others
Defendant:
Denka Performance Elastomer LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1367
JOHNSON v. SCHWARTZ et al
as 2:2018cv00903
Plaintiff:
REED JOHNSON
Defendant:
MARK SCHWARTZ, RYAN M. DUNLAP, CHRISTOPHER S. LENTO and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-1227
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
KATTUAH v. GALENA BIOPHARMA, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv01039
Plaintiff:
SUE KATTUAH
Defendant:
GALENA BIOPHARMA, INC., MARK J. AHN, MARK W. SCHWARTZ and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
MILLER v. GALENA BIOPHARMA, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv00929
Plaintiff:
STEVEN MILLER
Defendant:
GALENA BIOPHARMA, INC., MARK J. AHN, MARK W. SCHWARTZ and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
James Dunlap v. Cottman Transmissions System
as 16-2318
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES M. DUNLAP
Defendant - Appellee:
COTTMAN TRANSMISSIONS SYSTEMS, LLC and TODD P. LEFF
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
