Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Cummings v. McGinley et al
as 1:2023cv00937
Plaintiff:
William Cummings
Defendant:
Thomas McGinley, Christopher Symons, C.O. Luke Erdman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
EVANS v. YATRON et al
as 5:2021cv05348
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE M. EVANS
Defendant:
JUDGE PAUL M. YATRON, OFFICER RYAN SHUTT, OFFICER SUPERVISOR DAVID COSLETT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Saul
as 1:2021cv00554
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Dawn M. Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01648
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
BOYD et al v. DAVIS et al
as 2:2011cv05712
Plaintiff:
BURNS TILTON BOYD
Defendant:
DEANA R. DAVIS, JOHN H. ADAMS, MARY T. HOLLIGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EVANS v. MARINE TRANSPORT LINES INC.
as 2:2011cv38429
Plaintiff:
ALICE M EVANS
Defendant:
MARINE TRANSPORT LINES INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
EVANS v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv38430
Plaintiff:
ALICE M EVANS
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
LIETEAU v. JIM WALTER CORP. et al
as 2:2011cv63350
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH LIETEAU, JR. and WANDA M. EVANS
Defendant:
JIM WALTER CORP., CAREY CANADA, INC. and CELOTEX CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EVANS et al v. RAYBESTOS-MANHATTEN, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv79705
Plaintiff:
PEARLIE M. EVANS and HARMON O. CREEL
Defendant:
RAYBESTOS-MANHATTEN, INC., GAF CORPORATION, H. K. PORTER COMPANY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EVANS et al v. CROWN CORK & SEAL CO et al
as 2:2009cv65830
Plaintiff:
JOHN R. EVANS, JOHN R. EVANS, JOHN R. EVANS and others
Defendant:
CROWN CORK & SEAL CO, GARLOCK, INC., PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
