Cases 1 - 10 of 54
Albert C. Youngs v. M. Gamboa
as 5:2023cv00392
Petitioner:
Albert C. Youngs
Respondent:
M. Gamboa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Blake v. S. Foster et al.
as 1:2023cv00129
Plaintiff:
Garrod Blake
Defendant:
S Foster, D. Saucedo, R Tolson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GAMBOA v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2022cv01373
Plaintiff:
EDWARD M. GAMBOA, JR.
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
John Harold Ives v. M. Gamboa
as 2:2022cv06859
Petitioner:
John Harold Ives
Respondent:
M. Gamboa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Young v. Clark et al
as 1:2022cv01219
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Powell Young
Defendant:
Ken Clark, M. Gamboa, Galleger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Young v. Clark et al
as 2:2022cv01646
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Powell Young
Defendant:
Ken Clark, M. Gamboa, Galleger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carlos Hernandez v. M. Gamboa et al
as 5:2022cv01371
Petitioner:
Carlos Hernandez
Respondent:
M. Gamboa and Attorney General Rob Bonta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hernandez v. Gamboa et al
as 3:2022cv01106
Petitioner:
Carlos Hernandez
Respondent:
M. Gamboa and Rob Bonta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hernandez v. Gamboa et al
as 3:2022cv01111
Petitioner:
Carlos Hernandez
Respondent:
M. Gamboa and Rob Bonta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Garrod Blake v. S. Foster et al.
as 2:2022cv01558
Plaintiff:
Garrod Blake
Defendant:
S. Foster, D. Saucedo, R. Tolson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
