Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Hart v. Jackson et al
as 4:2024cv05014
Plaintiff:
Jason Mark Hart
Defendant:
Rob M Jackson, Robin Smith, Lamin Sennah and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Townsel v. Sawyer et al
as 2:2023cv00224
Plaintiff:
Eric Townsel
Defendant:
Kenneth Sawyer, David Kenney, Sandra Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demos v. Inslee et al
as 2:2023cv01171
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Defendant:
Jay R Inslee, State Attorney General, Robert Herzog and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demos v Jackson
as 2:2023cv00272
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Respondent:
Robert M Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Demos v. Pierce et al
as 4:2023cv05022
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Defendant:
Gary Pierce, Jennifer Adams, B Rohan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demos v Jackson
as 4:2023cv05020
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos
Respondent:
Robert M Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Demos v. Pierce et al
as 3:2023cv05070
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Defendant:
Gary Pierce, Jennifer Adams, B Rohan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demos v. Jackson
as 2:2023cv00057
Petitioner:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Respondent:
Robert M Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Demos v. Strange et al
as 4:2022cv05125
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Defendant:
Cheryl Strange, H.L. Griffith, Robert M Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demos v. Strange et al
as 2:2022cv01400
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Defendant:
Cheryl Strange, H.L. Griffith, Robert M Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
