Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02184
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01549
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez-Garcia et al v. DHL Express (USA), Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv01167
Plaintiff:
Juan Carlos Perez-Garcia , Natalia Diaz-Sanchez and Community Property Regime comprised of Perez-Diaz
Defendant:
DHL Express (USA), Inc., King Fisher Air Service, Air Safari, Inc., Air St. Kitts Nevis (2005) Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Van Praag et al v. DHL Express (USA), Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv01128
Plaintiff:
Jacob G. Van Praag , Luz M. Molinari-Arroyo and Conjugal Partnership Van Praag-Molinari
Defendant:
DHL Express (USA), Inc., Air St. Kitts Nevis (2005) Limited, Richard V. Hurley and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
ERROR - NOT USED
as 3:2013cv01127
Plaintiff:
Jacob G. Van Praag, Luz M Molinari-Arroyo and Conjugal Partnership Van Praag-Molinari
Defendant:
DHL Express (USA), Inc., King Fisher Air Service, Air Safari, Inc., Air St. Kitts Nevis (2005) Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
ANTONELLI et al v. GLOUCESTER CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2012cv04221
Plaintiff:
JAY ANTONELLI, JESSICA ANTONELLI, L.A. and others
Defendant:
GLOUCESTER CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, KENNETH IEPSON, JOSEPH ELLER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pate et al v. Poel et al
as 2:2011cv00289
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth M. Pate and Donald G. Long
Defendant:
Martin H Poel and Joe M Lamb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sanders et al v. Markovich et al
as 1:2007cv01480
Plaintiff:
Shawana Sanders, Christine Sanders, Treon Sanders and others
Defendant:
Nenad Markovich, Nenad Markovich, Raquel G Castaneda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
