Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 408
Ahmed v. Martel et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv00539
Plaintiff: Salim Daniel Ahmed
Defendant: M. Martel, K. W. Luttrell and E. Patao
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
James Russell, Jr. v. M. Martel
as 12-55211
Petitioner - Appellant: JAMES A. RUSSELL, Jr.
Respondent - Appellee: M. MARTEL, Warden
Terry Britton v. M Harris et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv00727
Petitioner: Terry Britton
Respondent: Kamala Harris and M Martell
Francis Davis v. M. Martel, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 11-18078
Plaintiff - Appellant: FRANCIS W. DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee: M. MARTEL, Warden, KAPLAN, Captain and CARS, Correctional Counselor
James A. Russell Jr. v.M. Martel We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2008cv00963
Respondent: M Martel
Petitioner: James A Russell, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carlos Avena v. M. Martel
as 11-73795
Petitioner: CARLOS J. AVENA
Respondent: M. MARTEL, Warden
Paul Bolin v. M. Martel
as 11-73796
Petitioner: PAUL C. BOLIN
Respondent: M. MARTEL, Warden
Turner v. Department of Correction and Rehabilitation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2011cv05624
Plaintiff: Melvin Turner
Defendant: Department of Correction and Rehabilitation, M. Martel, T. Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Martel We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2011cv05558
Plaintiff: Joseph Williams
Defendant: M. Martel, W. A. Rodriguez, J. Robertson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edward Harden v. CDCR, et al
as 11-56803
Petitioner - Appellant: EDWARD RENEE HARDEN
Respondent - Appellee: CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION and M. MARTEL, MCSP - Warden

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?