Cases 1 - 10 of 44
Downing v. Daniels et al
as 2:2022cv01317
Plaintiff:
Curtis L. Downing
Defendant:
Charles Daniels, John Borrowman, Steve Sisolak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PC) Crossley v. Cole et al
as 1:2022cv00408
Plaintiff:
Lamont Crossley
Defendant:
J. Cole, J. Williams, M. Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Crossley v. Cole et al
as 2:2022cv00563
Plaintiff:
Lamont Crossley
Defendant:
J. Cole, J. Williams, M. Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
The Cincinnati Insurance Company v. Leonard M. Ross
as 2:2022cv01671
Plaintiff:
The Cincinnati Insurance Company
Defendant:
Leonard M. Ross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
(PC) Duran v. Ross, et al.
as 1:2021cv01096
Plaintiff:
Paul Edward Duran
Defendant:
M. Ross, A. Valdez and E Parks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ross v. Arenestos
as 4:2021cv05293
Plaintiff:
Theresa M. Ross
Defendant:
Jhon Arenestos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02705
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv07225
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Ross v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 4:2019cv06450
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc., Johnson & Johnson and Johnson & Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc.
Plaintiff:
David M. Ross, Individually and as Successor in Interest to Carmeliza M. Day-Ross and David M. Ross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chimney Hill Properties, Ltd. et al v. The Cincinnati Insurance Company, et al
as 2:2019cv00095
Defendant:
The Cincinnati Insurance Company and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Plaintiff:
TBH19, LLC, Chimney Hill Properties, Ltd. and Leonard M. Ross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
