Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Gregory Smith v. Anthony Hedgpeth, et al
as 17-17009
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY ANDRE SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
ANTHONY HEDGPETH, Warden, L. TREXLER, Associate Warden of S.V.S.P., R. MACHUCA, Jr., Correctional Sergeant at S.V.S.P. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv13049
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Smith v. Hedgpeth et al
as 5:2016cv01269
Plaintiff:
Gregory Andre Smith
Defendant:
R. Machuca, Jr., M. Zornes, M. Roennmann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Boggus et al
as 2:2013cv00162
Plaintiff:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
Defendant:
J. Donald Boggus, Jr., Charles R. Fendley, John S. Dean, Sr. and others
Smith v. Stepp et al
as 5:2013cv03316
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Carlton Smith
Defendant:
L. Stepp, M. Zornes, J. Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Hedgpeth et al
as 4:2013cv01052
Plaintiff:
Gregory Andre Smith
Defendant:
Anthony Hedgpeth, L. Trexler, M. Roennmann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. Petersen et al
as 4:2012cv02480
Plaintiff:
Leon E. Morris
Defendant:
Petersen, Manzo, Kessler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawrence Carlton Smith v. L. Stepp
as 2:2011cv02277
Defendant:
D. Battles, D. Battles, J. Cermeno and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Carlton Smith
Lawrence C Smith et al v. L Stepp et al
as 2:2010cv09850
Defendant:
D Battles, D Battles, J Cermeno and others
Plaintiff:
Lawrence C Smith
Zorn v. NH Supreme Court, et al
as 09-2506
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL M. ZORN
Defendant - Appellee:
NH SUPREME COURT, JOHN T. BRODERICK, JR., Chief Justice, NH Supreme Court, in his Individual and in his Official Capacity, LINDA S. DALIANIS, Associate Justice, NH Supreme Court, in her Individual and Official Capacity and others
:
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
