Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03165
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01128
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Appeal From The Decision Of The Special Education Appeals Panel (IDEIA)
M.O. and B.O. et al v. Bason, et al
as 4:2021cv01566
Plaintiff:
M.O. and B.O., J.S. and E.S., B.L. and J.L. and others
Defendant:
Christina Bason, David Shimmel, Montoursville School Board and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2021cv00135
Plaintiff:
KEITH VERNON DAVIS
Respondent:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JOHN WETZEL, Superintendent BARRY R. SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Davis v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2021cv00826
Defendant:
E. Miller, Joel Barrows, John Wetzel and others
Plaintiff:
Keith Vernon Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NARANJO v. IVICIC et al
as 3:2021cv00072
Defendant:
D. J. CLOSE, M.J. PYO, M.M. IVICIC and others
Plaintiff:
ISAAC NARANJO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv02014
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
M.M. et al v. ROSE TREE MEDIA SCHOOL DISTRICT
as 2:2019cv01986
Defendant:
ROSE TREE MEDIA SCHOOL DISTRICT
Plaintiff:
M.M., PETER M. and TRACY M.
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
M.M., Parent and Natural Guardian of C.C., a minor v. School District Of The City Of York et al
as 1:2019cv00623
Defendant:
Randolph Hernandez and School District Of The City Of York
Plaintiff:
M.M., Parent and Natural Guardian of C.C., a minor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00275
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
