Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Jones v. McCall et al
as 0:2013cv01702
Plaintiff:
Anthony Bernard Jones, Sr
Defendant:
Michael McCall, Peggy E Spivey, McDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Ham v. McCall et al
as 6:2013cv00694
Plaintiff:
Angelo Ham
Defendant:
Warden McCall, Assoc Warden Nolan, Assoc Warden Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Kendall Green v. Sgt. Anderson
as 12-6802
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENDALL GREEN
Defendant - Appellee:
SERGEANT ANDERSON, of Lee Correctional Institution, JON OZMINT, Director of SCDC, LIEUTENANT RICHARDSON, SMU Security and others
David Bacchus v. Lt. Scarborough
as 11-7254
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID BACCHUS
Defendant - Appellee:
LT. SCARBOROUGH, LT. RICHARDSON, LT. ROGERS and others
James Blakely v. Robert Ward
as 11-6945
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES G. BLAKELY, a/k/a Jimmy G. Blakely
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT WARDS, Regional Director, DAVID M. TATARSKY, General Counsel Attorney, ANTHONY PADULA, Warden and others
James v. Padula et al
as 0:2011cv01562
Plaintiff:
Jerome W James
Defendant:
A J Padula, Nolan, Lt Commander and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Bacchus v. Lt. Scarborough
as 11-6440
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID BACCHUS
Defendant - Appellee:
LT. SCARBOROUGH, LT. RICHARDSON, LT. ROGERS and others
Bacchus v. Scarborough et al
as 6:2010cv02857
Plaintiff:
David Bacchus
Defendant:
Lt Scarborough, Lt Richardson, Lt Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
David Bacchus v. Major Dean
as 10-7205
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID BACCHUS
Defendant - Appellee:
MAJOR DEAN, ASSOCIATE WARDEN BELL and INVESTIGATOR GREER
Defendant:
WARDEN PADULA and JON OZMINT, Director
Bacchus v. Dean et al
as 6:2009cv01226
Defendant:
Major Dean, Associate Warden Bell, Investigator Greer and others
Plaintiff:
David Bacchus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
