Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Plaisance v. Cain
as 2:2012cv00239
Plaintiff:
Manuel Plaisance
Defendant:
Burl Cain
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaisance v. LeBlanc et al
as 3:2010cv00602
Defendant:
Burl Cain, Unknown Calvert, Joe Lamartiniere and others
Plaintiff:
Manuel Plaisance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manuel Plaisance v. Burl Cain, Warden, et al
as 09-30855
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MANUEL PLAISANCE
Defendant - Appellee:
BURL CAIN, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY, DARRYL VANNOY, Warden, SHIRLEY COODY, Warden and others
Manuel Plaisance v. Louisiana State Penitentiary, et al
as 09-30842
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MANUEL PLAISANCE
Defendant - Appellee:
LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY, BURL CAIN, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY, in His Individually and Official Capacities as Warden of Angola, DARREL VANNOY, in His Individual and Official Capacities as Deputy Warden of Angola Prison and others
Manuel Plaisance v. Louisiana State Penitentiary, et al
as 09-30361
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MANUEL PLAISANCE
Defendant - Appellee:
LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY, BURL CAIN, in His Individual and Official Capacities as Warden of Angola Prison, DARRYL VANNOY, in His Indiviual and Official Capacities as Deputy Warden of Angola Prison and others
Plaisance v. Louisiana State Penitentiary et al
as 3:2008cv00497
Plaintiff:
Manuel Plaisance
Defendant:
Louisiana State Penitentiary, Burl Cain, Darrel Vannoy and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaisance v. Cain, et al
as 08-30340
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MANUEL PLAISANCE
Defendant - Appellee:
BURL CAIN, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY, DARRYL VANNOY, Warden, SHIRLEY COODY, Warden and others
Plaisance v. Cain
as 2:2007cv00524
Plaintiff:
Manuel Plaisance
Defendant:
Burl Cain
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
