Cases 61 - 70 of 158
ROBILLARD et al v. PITTSBURGH-CORNING CORPORATION et al
as 2:2007cv67697
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR J. ROBILLARD and MARY ROBILLARD
Defendant:
PITTSBURGH-CORNING CORPORATION, CELOTEX CORPORATION, EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION
ThirdParty Defendant:
MANVILLE ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
FOSHAY et al v. CAREY CANADA, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv67761
Plaintiff:
LOUIS A. FOSHAY, JR. and ANNA MAE FOSHAY
Defendant:
CAREY CANADA, INC., EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC., CELOTEX CORP. and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION
ThirdParty Defendant:
MANVILLE ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
BAILEY et al v. CAREY CANADA, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv67771
Plaintiff:
PAUL H. BAILEY and LOUISE BAILEY
Defendant:
CAREY CANADA, INC., EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC., CELOTEX CORP. and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION
ThirdParty Defendant:
MANVILLE ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND, RUTLAND FIRE & CLAY and KEENE CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
EAGER et al v. A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv67786
Plaintiff:
GEORGE E. EAGER, BEATRICE EAGER, PHILIP BRADLEY and others
Defendant:
A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., RUTLAND FIRE CLAY CO., EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION
ThirdParty Defendant:
MANVILLE ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
MUNGER v. CAREY CANADA, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv67765
Plaintiff:
CLARA MUNGER
Defendant:
CAREY CANADA, INC., CELOTEX CORP., UNITED STATES MINERAL PRODUCTS CO. and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION
ThirdParty Defendant:
MANVILLE ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
SOVITSKY et al v. RUTLAND FIRE CLAY CO. et al
as 2:2007cv67820
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL SOVITSKY and FAY SOVITSKY
Defendant:
RUTLAND FIRE CLAY CO., CAREY CANADA, INC., EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION
ThirdParty Defendant:
MANVILLE ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
RELYEA v. RUTLAND FIRE CLAY CO. et al
as 2:2007cv67818
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR H. RELYEA, JR.
Defendant:
RUTLAND FIRE CLAY CO., CAREY CANADA, INC., EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION
ThirdParty Defendant:
MANVILLE ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
OCCHIALINO et al v. ACANDS, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv67728
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY JOSEPH OCCHIALINO and RUTH T. OCCHIALINO
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC., A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., BABCOCK & WILCOX CO. and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION
ThirdParty Defendant:
MANVILLE ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
MARUCO et al v. A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv67785
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH A. MARUCO and PHYLLIS MARUCO
Defendant:
A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., RUTLAND FIRE CLAY CO., EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION
ThirdParty Defendant:
MANVILLE ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
DESALVATORE et al v. ACANDS, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv67725
Plaintiff:
DOMINICK DESALVATORE, SR. and GINA DESALVATORE
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC., A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., BABCOCK & WILCOX CO. and others
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION
ThirdParty Defendant:
MANVILLE ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.